Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gijs Brouwer vs Javier Barranco Cosano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brouwer vs Cosano analysis and find out who is favored!
Gijs Brouwer vs Javier Barranco Cosano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brouwer 0 - 0 Cosano
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brouwer has won 51.61% of points on his second serve, while Cosano has won 53.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brouwer, in recent form, has won 51.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cosano has won 54.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 37.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brouwer has saved 61.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cosano has saved 60.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brouwer has won 45.16% of matches played (W/L 28/ 34), with Cosano winning 66.67% (W/L 52/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 82/ 69). Cosano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 298/ 177), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21), where as Cosano has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 30/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brouwer has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.32 while Cosano has played against players with an average rank of 329.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brouwer has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cosano has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brouwer has converted 34.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cosano has converted 45.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brouwer 0 - 0 Cosano
241
Rank
114
High
28
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
259
Rank
247
High
25
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
58% (311-229)
Career Total W/L
62% (330-205)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
67% (24-12)
$277,135
Career Prize Money
$32,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gijs Brouwer | Javier Barranco Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 67% (24/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (29/31) | 62% (55/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (298/294) | 55% (450/374) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 67% (6/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 69% (18/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 94 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:13 | 1:51:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 281.34 | 345.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1275/1895) | 63% (1600/2554) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (867/1275) | 64% (1022/1600) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (320/620) | 55% (522/954) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (64/187) | 45% (142/314) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (728/1913) | 44% (1138/2609) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 100% (1/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (10/12) | 59% (16/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (14/28) | 68% (23/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 53% (9/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 81% (26/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 19% (26/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Gijs Brouwer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Antoine Bellier
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Felix Gill
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | n/p | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Gijs Brouwer
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Gijs Brouwer
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Denis Kudla
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Hady Habib
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Gijs Brouwer
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Dominik Palan
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
68%
(
71 of
105)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
118)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
15
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Felix Gill
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Hugo Grenier
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Brouwer Vs Cosano Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
